The Role of Stigma Toward Mental Illness in Probation Officers’ Perceptions of Risk and Case Management Decisions (2018)

By Jennifer Eno Louden, Sarah M. Manchak, Elijah P. Ricks, Patrick J. Kennealy |

International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology -

This study analyzes how probation officers’ perceptions of mental illness affect how they evaluate risk assessments for offenders. 89 probation officers were given a vignette-based design where they were given two separate hypothetical offenders who were of the same risk classification, except one had a mental illness. The study provides that stigma towards mental illness had little effect on risk assessment decisions. However, the offender with a mental illness received more punitive measures compared to their counterpart.

Jennifer Eno Louden is a Professor in the Department of Psychology at the University of El Paso, Texas. Sarah M. Manchek is a Professor in the School of Criminal Justice at the University of Cincinnati. Elijah P. Ricks is a Professor of Forensic Psychology at Roosevelt University. Patrick J. Kennealy researches criminal justice at the Travis County Community Justice Services.

READ ARTICLE

Keywords: Mental illness, risk assessment, vignette, probation, probation officer, stigma, mental illness stigma