Putting Teeth into AB 109: Why California’s Historic Public Safety Realignment Act Should Require Reentry Programming (2013)

By Kathleen N. Flynn |

Golden Gate University Law Review -

A reporter’s perspective on realignment and probation reform policy in California. Provides insight of A.B. 109’s effects on county jails and emphasizes importance of post-release rehabilitation in reducing recidivism. Uses realignment plan statistics from Riverside, San Bernardino, and several other counties to highlight funding strategies with a focus on probation and rehabilitation. Article makes claim that proper funding for reentry programs is a solution for realignment to be successful.

Kathleen Nye Flynn is a reporter for the Los Angeles Downtown News with a degree in Political Science and Print Journalism.

Read Article

Keywords: Realignment, recidivism, AB 109, AB 117, SB 678, Probation Subsidy Act of 1965, AB 118, Day reporting centers, Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, Post Release Community Supervision, PRCS, Proposition 30, Brown v. Plata, Coleman v. Wilson, Eighth Amendment, CDCR, 2013, Flynn, California, state, report, quantitative, Riverside County, Kern County, San Bernardino County, San Joaquin County, Victorville County, San Francisco County, Santa Cruz County, Siskiyou County, and Napa County, Golden Gate University Law Review, negative findingsRealignment, recidivism, AB 109, AB 117, SB 678, Probation Subsidy Act of 1965, AB 118, Day reporting centers, Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011, Post Release Community Supervision, PRCS, Proposition 30, Brown v. Plata, Coleman v. Wilson, Eighth Amendment, CDCR, 2013, Flynn, California, state, report, quantitative, Riverside County, Kern County, San Bernardino County, San Joaquin County, Victorville County, San Francisco County, Santa Cruz County, Siskiyou County, and Napa County, Golden Gate University Law Review, negative findings